Lazy Loading Images? Don’t Rely On JavaScript!

So much of the internet is now made up of pages containing loads of images; just visit your favourite shopping site and scroll through a product listing page for an example of this.

As you can probably imagine, bringing in all of these images when the page loads can add unnecessary bloat, causing the user to download lots of data they may not see. It can also make the page slow to interact with, due to the page layout constantly changing as new images load in, causing the browser to reprocess the page.

One popular method to deal with this is to “Lazy Load” the images; that is, to only load the images just before the user will need to see them.

If this technique is applied to the “above the fold” content – i.e., the first average viewport-sized section of the page – then the user can get a significantly faster first view experience.

So everyone should always do this, right?

Before we get on to that, let’s look at how this is usually achieved. It’s so easy to find a suitable jQuery plugin or angularjs module that a simple install command later and you’re almost done; just add a new attribute to image tags or JavaScript method to process the images you want to delay loading for.

So surely this is a no-brainer?

Let’s look at what we’re actually trying to achieve here; display some images on a web page (achievable with html alone), but delay when they appear (needs more than just html).

The jquery or angularjs solutions have a dependency on JavaScript, jquery, and angularjs; what if the browser doesn’t support JavaScript? What if the user doesn’t want to download a bloating library or two or three when all you’re trying to achieve is an image load delay?

What if any number of browser toolbars, extensions, plugins, adverts, etc has a JavaScript error; now your user can’t see more than a page of images! Seems pretty daft, right?

Progressively Enhanced Lazy Loading Images

Given the potential limitations, let’s work on a solution that can handle all my concerns:
a. works without JavaScript (i.e., lazy loading is an enhancement)
b. vanilla js – no dependencies on jquery or angularjs
c. works with broken JavaScript (i.e., the browser supports JavaScript, but there’s a js error somewhere which causes your script to break; might not even be your fault!)

Approaching this logically, it makes sense to use a data attribute on an image element, and swap that for the src attribute when the element is getting close to the viewport. Something like:

width="300px" />

and then some JavaScript like:

var lazy = document.getElementsByClassName('lazy');

for(var i=0; i<lazy.length; i++){
 lazy[i].src = lazy[i].getAttribute('data-src');

a) No JavaScript

Seems like a logical first step. So how could we change this to support no JavaScript? With a bit of html repetition perhaps:

width="300px" />

    width="300px" />

That would mean that the lazy loading would be ignored if JavaScript is disabled. I did a quick check on the network usage for code like this and can confirm that a basic noscript img check using the code above does not cause multiple requests! You’d assume not, but it’s worth checking!

b) no jQuery/angularjs

Using the html above, we can write the following JavaScript method to do the data-src to src switching:

function lazyLoad(){
    var lazy =

    for(var i=0; i<lazy.length; i++){
       lazy[i].src = 

Then let’s create a simple event wiring up helper for cross-browser support (since we’re not using jQuery):

function registerListener(event, func) {
    if (window.addEventListener) {
        window.addEventListener(event, func)
    } else {
        window.attachEvent('on' + event, func)

And the register the lazyload method to execute when the page loads.

registerListener('load', lazyLoad);

Now when the page loads we’re getting all images with the lazy class and loading them using JavaScript; this certainly delays the loading, but it’s not intelligent.

Sounds like I need a bit of viewport logic. Something like this (as nicked from StackOverflow):

function isInViewport(el){
    var rect = el.getBoundingClientRect();

return (
    rect.bottom >= 0 && 
    rect.right >= 0 && <= (
    window.innerHeight || 
    document.documentElement.clientHeight) && 

    rect.left <= (
    window.innerWidth || 

I’ll also need to add the viewport check:

function lazyLoad(){
    var lazy = 

    for(var i=0; i<lazy.length; i++) {
           lazy[i].src =

and register the scroll event:

registerListener('scroll', lazyLoad);

This is bad, mkay? You shouldn’t be changing the page whilst the user is scrolling. This is meant to be an example implementation of lazy loading; please feel free to improve it!

Now we’ve got a page that will only load the images within the viewport, and will load all images normally if JavaScript is disabled.

You can check it out here:

Quick bit of refactoring

Before moving on to the “broken JavaScript” requirement, I want to tidy up the code a bit; right now it will check all lazy images on every scroll event, even if they’ve already been loaded.

This isn’t a big deal for my demo, but it may be suboptimal for pages with more images. Plus it just feels messy! I want to remove images that have already been loaded from the lazy array.

Firstly, let’s move the lazy array to a shared variable and set it in a function that’s called on load:

var lazy = [];

function setLazy(){
 lazy = document.getElementsByClassName('lazy');

registerListener('load', setLazy);

Ok, now we have all lazy images in that shared array but I need to keep it up to date. I’m going to remove the data-src attribute once I’ve used it, then filter all lazy images:

function lazyLoad(){
    for(var i=0; i<lazy.length; i++){
            if (lazy[i].getAttribute('data-src')){
                lazy[i].src = 

                // remove the attribute


function cleanLazy(){
    lazy =
                return l.getAttribute('data-src');

That feels better. Now the lazy array will always contain only those images that have not been loaded yet. However it’s doing quite a lot during an onscroll event, as mentioned before.

This version can be found at:

c) Broken JavaScript

I love this requirement; it’s a tricky one to solve. If the browser says it supports JavaScript, then the noscript tags will be ignored. However, the browser may still fail to execute JavaScript for any of the reasons I mentioned at the start, or more.

How about this?

  1. Load enough images to fill the viewport un-lazily; i.e., just regular img tags with their src attributes set
  2. Under those images have a link to a new page that is completely un-lazy – i.e., a whole page full of plain old <img> tags
  3. Hide all lazy images using css
  4. Use JavaScript to remove the link and remove the css that hides the lazy images

Let’s follow this through: if the page loads and JavaScript breaks, the user will see one screen of images (1) and a link to “view more” (2) which will take them to a full page (anchored to where they left off).

If the page loads and JavaScript is ok, the link will not be there (4) and the lazy load images will flow into view as intended (3).

Let’s try it out. You can use your own site’s analytics to see what the average user’s resolution is, and calculate how many items would fit in their initial viewport in order to decide where to put this “under the fold” link (2):

<div id="viewMore">
    <a href="flatpage.html#more">View more</a>

Assume flatpage.html is just a non-lazy version of the same page, with an anchor element at the same point in the list of items.

Now let’s initially hide the lazy load images too (3). I’m surrounding them with a new element:

<span id="nextPage" class="hidden">
    // all lazy load items go here

and the css for that class:

 .hidden {display:none;}

This will capture those users with broken JavaScript by showing an initial viewport and a link to the full page. To re-enable the lazy load for users with working JavaScript, I’m just doing this in my setLazy function (4):

// delete the view more link

// display the lazy items

The resulting code looks like this:

Or play in the pen:


As you can see, it is certainly possible to achieve lazy loading images (and other content, should you want to) whilst still allowing for both broken JavaScript and a complete lack of JavaScript support.

There’s a github repo to show the difference between the main listing page and the “flat” listing page as a more “realistic” implementation:

This repo shows how you might implement the solution in .Net, passing the same dynamically generated collection of items to both listing pages.

18 thoughts on “Lazy Loading Images? Don’t Rely On JavaScript!

  1. Just a small note. For the use of addEventListener, and providing a fallback to attachEvent for IE – please be aware that only IE8 and below will need this. I’d argue that if you are building a site today, you don’t need to support IE8 at all. If you have legacy support for IE8 (e.g. enterprise software), if you haven’t already put out the End Of Life notification to your customers, you need to do so ASAP.

    PS Microsoft End Of Life’d IE8, IE9, IE10 as of January 12, 2016:

  2. Hey,

    Really great post here! I loved the examples – lazy loading is in my backlog to implement, so I’m going to be trying a lot of ideas from this post.


  3. Great tutorial on the lazyloading! My big question is how do I combine this technique with srcset or responsive images?

    • I think that since srcset / picture element are not dependent on javascript, then you could implement each img as a picture element or a srcset img with pretty much the same functionality; it’d become really verbose, but should work. Have a go, let me know if it works!

  4. var lazy =

    for(var i=0; i<lazy.length; i++){
    lazy[i].getAttribute('data-src', lazy[i].src);
    lazy[i].src = "blank.png";

    So if js is disabled images are normal.
    If js is enabled – lazyLoad works normally..

    • Hi!

      If you want to do that, you need to execute that JavaScript after the browser has parsed/rendered all the html, so it will be already downloading all the images… changing the src at that point won’t prevent the requests nor the downloads, so the solution is kind of pointless.

      It will look like you’re lazy loading the images but under the hood they’ll all download at the beginning.

      It’s better to not do this.

    • As Ignacio says, your browser will attempt to preload any img’s src way before any js gets a chance to kick in. Swapping them out with js will be mainly too late.

  5. The only issue with this is your essentially doubling the markup text output.. and if you have a large ecommerce website showing hundreds of products (images) on the same page, this can grow fast.

    This is good for smaller pages and “landing pages.” When you run a site which relies on JavaScript to convert a sale, then use your better judgement and decide if this is really a concern or not.

    • Doubling markup that’s gzipped by your server, and possibly even html minified ( ) is still, even for an “enterprise” scale site, going to be more efficient for both the end user and the site owner than wasting bandwidth with unnecessary images being loaded (i.e., images the user doesn’t see, since they don’t scroll down far enough).

      Although, if you’ve got to the point where you’re thinking about limiting how much html you’re sending over the wire, you must have already optimized every other aspect of the site – in which case, excellent work!

      • Gzipping does help, but I guess I’d argue that expecting a browser and client to support JavaScript is “OK” at this point on the web, wouldn’t you agree?

        • Sure, and this is why I feel the 3rd point in the article is the most important; dealing with broken js. Your browser says js is fine, but for one of any number of reasons the js fails to load or fire. You still should try to deliver a functional (though not necessarily so enhanced) experience to your end user IMO

  6. It’s cool, but usually I think most businesses should settle for good old fashioned prioritising of content and breaking your message over a few pages. One of my large friction points with clients is when they want to turn their digital marketing into a magic-act and have things appear and disappear, fly in from all over the place, flashing, blinking and late loading etc. It’s all a little homer simpson for me.

    • Sure, but how would you ask the business to prioritise content in a product listing across multiple pages, when all they want is a smooth, continuous, product list stream?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *